RULESWATCH

April 14, 2009

Jurisprudence sans frontieres: Foreign Authority in the US Supreme Court

Filed under: 1 — ruleswatch @ 8:49 pm

Ongoing American ideological bun fighting  over whether the US Supreme Court should cite to foreign authorities in working out its own judgements has spilled into the pages of the New York Times. Sunday’s edition quotes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (a proponent of using outside authority) as saying, “The Canadian Supreme Court, she said, is ‘probably cited more widely abroad than the U.S. Supreme Court.’ ”  

Lest anyone’s head were to swell too quickly, the judge made sure that the implication was clear: 

There is one reason for that,” she said: “You will not be listened to if you don’t listen to others.”

At the same time, another great American thinker, CNN’s Lou Dobbs, is outraged by the very idea that US jurisprudes would even think about looking elsewhere for test-driven ideas.  

Ginsburg must be wrong.

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: